Jan. 5 "Confederate menaces against neutral rights." 47 Article of Historicus in the London Times, of January 16, 1865.
The bark Maury at New York.
Mr. Crampton to Mr. Marcy.
Oct. 11 Inclosing depositions of Mr. Barclay, British consul at New York, and others, in refer- ence to the bark Maury, alleged to be fitting out for the Russian government, and asking the United States government to investigate the facts, and should the charges be confirmed, to take measures to defeat hostile intentions of the persons engaged in fitting out said vessel. Atten- tion is also asked to Mr. Barclay's state- ment that a plan exists for equipping similar vessels in other United States ports.
Mr. Hunter to Oct. 12 Inclosing copy of Mr. Crampton's note of Mr. Cushing. October 11, with accompanying affidavits, in reference to bark Maury.
Mr. Cushing to Oct. 12 Telegraphic order to take information from Mr. McKeon. Mr. Barclay, and prosecute bark Maury if cause appears.
Mr. Cushing to Oct. 12 Notifying Secretary of State of instructions
Mr. McKeon to Oct. 13 Mr. Barclay.
Mr. McKeon to Oct. 13 Mr. Redfield.
sent to United States attorney at New York in respect to bark Maury. Requesting information in reference to bark Maury.
Asking an inspector to be sent on board bark Maury to examine her cargo, and that her clearance be delayed until inspector's report is received.
Mr. Cushing to Oct. 13 Inclosing copy of Mr. Crampton's note of the Mr. McKeon.
Mr. Benedict to Oct. 15 Mr. Redfield. Mr. McKeon to Oct. 16 Mr. Edwards.
Mr. McKeon to Oct. 17 Mr. Cushing.
11th in regard to the bark Maury, referred to in telegram of 12th.
Inclosing report of inspectors who examined the bark Maury.
Notifying him that a libel has been prepared against the bark Maury in consequence of charges of British minister, and that verification of the pleading by some one representing British government is neces-
Reporting that a libel was that day filed in United States district court against the bark Maury under third section of neu- trality act of April 20, 1818.
Mr. McKeon to Oct. 17 Requesting a careful examination and report
as to cargo of the bark Maury, intimating that munitions of war are supposed to be stowed under the coal in her hold.
Mr. A. A. Low to Oct. 18 Mr. McKeon.
Mr. Hillyer to Mr. McKeon.
Mr. Edwards to Mr. McKeon. Mr. McKeon to Mr. Cushing.
Sworn statement of Mr. Low and Nathan B. 57 Palmer explaining the construction and armament of the bark Maury, and pledging themselves to prove to the satisfaction of the British consul that the charges against said bark are groundless. Requesting, also, that in case of such satisfactory proof the consul bear the expense thereof. Oct. 19 Reporting examination of cargo of bark Maury and stating that should it be found necessary to overhaul it thoroughly and take out the coal, the expense would prob- ably reach one hundred and fifty or two hundred dollars.
Oct. 19 Expressing satisfaction with Mr. Low's statement, and his opinion that the libel against bark Maury should be lifted. Oct. 19 Inclosing statement of one of the firm of A. A. Low & Brothers, owners of the bark Maury, and letter of Mr. Edwards in ref- erence to that vessel; also, stating that he had discharged the vessel, and asking approval of Attorney General. Inclosing Mr. McKeon's letter of this date in reference to bark Maury.
Mr. Cushing to Oct. 19 Mr. Marcy.
Mr. Cushing to Oct. 22 Mr. McKeon.
Mr. Cushing to Oct. 22 Mr. Marcy.
Messrs. A. A. Low & Brothers to Mr. Stevens.
Act of Congress.. Mar. 10
Acknowledging receipt of his letter of 19th and approving his course therein described. Communicating history and result of pro- ceedings in case of bark Maury, and giv- ing a resumé of affidavits, statements, and explanations in said case. Inclosing copies of Mr. McKeon's report on affida- vits submitted by parties interested in Maury and Mr. Edward's letter to Mr. McKeon.
Giving statement of proceedings in case of bark Maury, and inclosing card from Mr. Barclay, published in New York Herald, denying that munitions were found "con- cealed under a quantity of cotton on board," and stating that had the Messrs. Low's explanations been given sooner, the course adopted would not have been re- sorted to. Messrs. Low complain of the character of the proceedings against their vessel, and of the insufficiency of Mr. Bar- clay's apology.
Concerning punishment of military expedi- tions against the conterminous territory of foreign governments at peace with the United States.
Mr. Marcy to the May 11 President.
Transmitting copies of correspondence be- tween United States and foreign govern- ments concerning rights of neutrals and of belligerents in the pending war with Europe. Called for by resolution of the House of Representatives of the 1st instant.
Mr. Crampton to Apr. 21 Stating that the English and French gov- Mr. Marcy.
ernments have decided not to issue letters of marque, &c., in the war with Russia. Inclosing a copy of Queen's proclamation asserting her right to seize contraband of war and maintain blockade as against neutrals; but waiving her right to seize enemy's property on board of neutral, or neutral property on board of enemy's ships, and to issue letters of marque. Her Majesty's government confidently trusts that the United States will observe the strictest neutrality.
Count de Sar- Apr. 28 Stating that the French and English gov- tiges to Mr. Marcy.
ernments have decided not to issue letters of marque, &c., in the war with Russia, and inclosing copy of the Emperor's pro- clamation, identical in terms with that of the Queen of England. His Majesty con- fidently trusts that the United States will observe the strictest neutrality.
Mr. Marcy to Mr. Apr. 28 Acknowledging receipt of his note of the Crampton.
Mr. Crampton to May Mr. Marcy.
21st, covering copy of Queen's proclama- tion in reference to rules of conduct to be observed in war with Russia. These com- munications having been submitted to the President, he expresses his satisfac- tion that the doctrine of free ships make free goods," so long contended for by United States, has received qualified sanc- tion of Great Britain and France, and his wish that it might be henceforth fully recognized as a rule of international law. The United States desire to unite with other powers in a declaration to that ef- fect. The United States will observe the strictest neutrality in the forthcoming war, and will rigidly enforce obedience to its laws upon that subject.
9 Inclosing copy of the London Gazette of the 18th ultimo, containing two orders of the Queen, extending to the 15th instant the time allowed for Russian ships to clear from, and bring cargoes to, Great Britain from Russian ports not blockaded, and granting additional facilities to trade with such ports.
25 Mr. Buchanan to Feb. 24 Detailing conversation with Lord Clarendon
in reference to course to be pursued by Great Britain with regard to neutrals during impending war. Lord Clarendon said that subject was before cabinet, but not yet decided. Decision should be at once communicated to Mr. Buchanan. Mr. Buchanan contended for the American doctrine of "free ships, free goods." and referred to the evil consequences hitherto
following the abuse of the right of search. The United States waited for the consent of the great maritime nations to this doc- trine before concluding treaties with minor powers. Mr. Buchanan is of opinion that Great Britain will yield in this matter to our wishes and the desires of European governments. Lord Clarendon commended highly our neutrality law (of April 20, 1818) as superior to that of England, es- pecially in regard to privateers. Mr. Buchanan suggests that the President issue a proclamation after the war shall. have commenced, exhorting the proper authorities to be vigilant in executing this law.
Giving account of interview with Lord Clarendon, in which the latter read her Majesty's forthcoming declaration in re- gard to neutrals, conforming to American doctrine in regard to blockade, and waiv- ing right to issue letters of marque. Mr. Buchanan stated strongly his approbation of the course therein indicated. Lord Clarendon spoke of the difficulty in chang- ing the former practice. He had repeated to the cabinet his conversation with Mr. Buchanan, which had been influential in inducing them to adopt this liberal policy toward neutrals. Although the declara- tion had not been finally revised by the cabinet, its principles would not be changed. Mar. 24 Referring to conversation with Lord Claren- don about privateering. Lord Clarendon spoke strongly against it as contrary to modern civilization, and complimented highly the treaties of the United States with different nations, stipulating that if the subjects of one of the parties, being neutral, accept commissions to cruise against the other from an opposing belli- gerent, they shall be punished as pirates. Mr. Buchanan says that these ideas were doubtless suggested by apprehensions that Americans would accept privateering commissions from Russia, and that though his lordship did not propose such a treaty that was evidently his drift. In answer, Mr. Buchanan admitted abuses of priva- teering, but thought we could not agree to its abolition, unless naval powers would consent to total abolition of war upon private property at sea as on land. This policy, he thought, was dictated by Chris- tianity and civilization, and would be supported by the United States.
Her Majesty's declaration, referred to in dispatch of the 17th, has given great sat- isfaction to diplomatic representatives in London, and is more liberal than was ex- pected.
35 Mr. Marcy to Mr. April 13 Expressing satisfaction of United States Buchanan.
government with the two main points of course indicated by Lord Clarendon to be pursued by British government in the event of a European war. France is ex- pected to follow the same course. Both Great Britain and France would like to enter into treaty with United States, stipulating that the subjects of either, being a neutral, who should accept priva- teering commissions from an opposing belligerent to cruise against the other party, should be treated as pirates. The United States government would not con sent to a convention totally suppressing privateering, which would preclude it from resorting to its merchant marine in case of war. The government trusts Great Britain will not adhere to her doctrines in regard to blockade and neutral trade with belligerents asserted during wars after the French Revolution. The "right of search," if exercised against us harshly in the approaching war, will excite deep and wide-spread indignation.
12 Mr. Mason to Mr. Mar. 22 Refers to the difficulty of combined action
between France and England in regard to neutrals, on account of the difference in their hitherto adopted policy. Has en- deavored to impress upon the French gov- ernment that the United States would not be satisfied except by the recognition of those liberal principles which she has always maintained, and that, should these principles be adopted, our government would have no difficulty in preserving neutrality. He regards the occasion as auspicious for the establishment of our cherished doctrines on this subject. Mar. 30 Inclosing slips from Moniteur, containing report of minister of foreign affairs and Emperor's declaration on subject of neu- trals, letters of marque, &c. Mr. Mason thinks these documents will prove satis- factory. Communicating the policy of strict neutral- ity resolved upon by the King of Denmark in concert with the King of Sweden and Norway in reference to the war declared by the Porte. Belligerent, war, or mer- chant vessels may enter Danish ports, the government reserving the right to inter- dict them from the port of Christiana. Privateers will not be admitted to any Danish port or anchorage. Belligerent vessels may purchase anything in Danish ports, except contraband of war. Prizes, except in distress, must not enter Danish ports. Danish vessels and cargoes should receive every security from belligerents. The King deems these regulations to be conformable to the law of nations.
Mr. Bille to Mr. Jan. 28 Marcy.
« ZurückWeiter » |