NEILSON v. HARFORD. (Motion to enter verdict for the plaintiff.)... 231 1 Web. P. C. 328. See also 8 Mee. & W. 806; 11 L. J. Ex. NEILSON . THOMPSON. (Bill for injunction against infringement.). 136 NEILSON v. THOMPSON. (Appeal to discharge injunction.)......... 151 QUEEN v. WALTON. (Rule to show cause, etc.).. 2 Q. B. Ad. & E. 969. QUEEN v. WALTON. (Scire facias to annul patent.)..... 366 Re DOWNTON'S PATENT. (Application for extension.)...... 1 Web. P. C. 565. Re GRIFFITHS. (Petition to seal patent.)...... Hindmarch, 535. Re JONES'S PATENT. (Application for extension.)...... Re KAY'S PATENT. (Application for extension.)................ Re QUARRILL'S PATENT. (Application for extension.)....... Re ROBERTS'S PATENT. (Petition for extension.).... 1 Web. P. C. 573. Re RUBERY'S PATENT. (Amendment of specification.).. 1 Web. P. C. 649, note. Re SAMUDA. (Petition to seal patent.). Hindmarch, 535. tions, etc.) 52 .... 389 118 56 9 117 5 135 .....note, 389. Re SHARP'S PATENT. (Petition to correct memorandum of altera 1 Web. P. C. 641. See also 10 L. J. Ch. 86; 3 Bead. 245. Re SIMISTER'S PATENT. (Application for extension.)..... 4 Moore Privy C. C. 164. See also 1 Web. P. C. 721. 126 510 Re WOODCROFT'S PATENT. (Application for extension.). ........ 188 1 Web. P. C. 740. Re WRIGHT'S PATENT. (Petition for extension.)..... 1 Web. P. C. 575. RODGERS, STOCKER v... RUBERY'S PATENT, Re. SAMUDA, Re...... SANDIFORD v. NEILD. (Action for infringement.)..... 1 Web. P. C. 311, note. SHARP'S PATENT, Re. SIMISTER'S PATENT, Re..... SKEWES, BICKFORD v.. SKEWES, BICKFORD v..... SMITH, CARPENTER v... SMITH, CARPENTER v.. .... 8 532 135 389 435 126 510 11 290 339 358 487 .... 360 SMITH v. WATSON. (Trial of action for infringement.)... 21 Newton Lon. Jour. 138. SPILSBURY v. CLOUGH. (Demurrer to plea.)..... 2 Gale & D. 17. See also 6 Jur. 579; 2 Q. B. 466; 1 Web. P. C. 255; 11 L. J. Q. B. 109. SPOTTISWOODE, BACON v.......... 28 WALTON v. POTTER. (Rule to enter verdict for the defendants.)..... 318 WILBY, GILLETT V...... WILSON v. TINDAL. (Motion for an injunction.). . 1 Web. P. C. 730, note. WOODCROFT'S PATENT, Re. WRIGHT'S PATENT, Re..... 70 353 188 8 Cited in Hicks v. Kelsey, 18 Wall. 670; O'Reilly v. Morse, 15 How. 62; Pa. RR. v. Locom. Truck Co., 110 U. S. 490; Hotchkiss v. Greenwood, 11 How. 248. GIBSON v. BRAND........ 312 Cited in Leroy v. Tatham, 14 How. 156. NEILSON v. HARFORD..... 231 Cited in O'Reilly . Morse, 15 How. 62; Hogg v. Emerson, 6 How. 437; Hogg v. Emerson, 11 How. 587; Winans v. Denmead, 15 How. 330. NEILSON v. HARFORD.......... 190 Cited in Burr v. Duryea, 1 Wall. 531; Tilghman v. Proctor, 12 Otto, 707; Leroy v. Tatham, 14 How. 156. Cited in Am. Wood Pulp Co. v. Fibre Disintegrating Co., 23 Wall. 566. WALTON v. POTTER....... 162 ..... Cited in Burr v. Duryea, 1 Wall. 531; Winans v. Denmead, 15 How. 330. |