17. Hochin, Mayne v. 105. Smith v. 347, 348. Hodgson v. Watson, 297. v. Earl of Warrington, 136. 141. Hogarth, Edwards v. 104. v. Kirby, 313. Holder v. Chambury, 362. Holgate v. Grantham, 66. Hollard v. Battel, 356. Holme, Higginbotham v. 16. Custance v. 7. Holt, Birch v. 237. Holworthy v. Mortlock, 11. Hinchinbrooke, Lord, v. Seymour, Hood, Beckford v. 273. Whitchurch v. 195. Homfray, Forman v. 307. brook v. 297. Hoare, Claridge v. 18. Collard v. 130. Hoare, Hill v. 130. Partington v. 81, 82. Hooper, Lawley v. 16. Mordaunt v. 304. Dare v. 218. Howard v. 11. Canham v. 314. Coysgarne v. 140. Davis v. 154. v. Jones, 350. Oniel v. 23. v. Pugh, 304. v. Lord Strafford, 35. Thompson v. 52. Jory v. Cox, 45. 299. Kempson, Smith v. 138. Kendal, Ex parte, 6. Kendrick v. Hopkins, 358. Kennedy v. Earl of Cassilis, 143. Norris v. 126. Kennett v. Abbott, 7. v. Dalton, 73. v. Greenwoollers, 14. -v. Browne, 14. Kidney v. Coussmaker, 9. Kilmorey, Lord, v. Thackeray, 198. Kilvington v. Gardner, 14. Langstaffe v. Fenwick, 10. Langston, Bignal v. 295. Leeds, Duke of, v. Earl of Straf- ford, 362. Boylston v. 338, 339. Legard, Johnson v. 17. Stationers' Company v. 270. Lingard v. Webb, 131. v. Risdon, 152, v. Lord Vernon, 175. Leech, Rex v. 228. Leeds, Duke of, v. New Radnor. 362. Lister, Buxton v. 11. Litchfield, Ulrich v. 7. Litton, Robinson v. 162. 166. 170, 171. Llewellyn, Evans v. 9. 12. |