Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB

To Edmund Randolph, July 30th

The disposition he will make of the shares voted him by the

Assembly-Probable interpretations of his conduct―The James
River meeting.

To Edmund Randolph, August 13th.

The two river improvements-Wishes them to progress

equally-His subscriptions-Presidency of the James Company
-His western lands and the claims.

To Richard Henry Lee, August 22d.

Great Britain and the western posts-The Mississippi-No

cement to the union but interest-Paper money in Virginia.

The powers of Congress-Reasons for increasing them-

Policy of the southern members-Unreasonable jealousies-A
war of imposts—A navigation act.

Coinage plans-Always a friend to adequate' congressional

powers-The ordinance on western lands-The Potomac navi-

gation.

Reported desire to obtain a loan-Wanted for the Dismal

Swamp Company-Money and labor needed.

Declines the presidency of the James River Company-Sur-

veys between the James and Kanawha-Slaves and an engineer
-Plans of the Potomac Company-Results of Rumsey's dis-
covery-Cost of miners-Subscriptions.

THE WRITINGS OF

GEORGE WASHINGTON.

SIR,

TO BRIGADIER-GENERAL HAZEN.

HEAD-QUARTERS, 3 May 1782.

The enemy, persisting in that barbarous line of conduct, they have pursued during the course of this war, have lately most inhumanly executed Captain Joshua Huddy, of the Jersey State troops, taken prisoner by them at a post on Tom's River; and in consequence I have written to the British Commander-in-chief, that, unless the perpetrators of that horrid deed were delivered up, I should be under the disagreeable necessity of retaliating, as the only means left to put a stop to such inhuman proceedings.

You will, therefore, immediately on receipt of this, designate by lot for the above purpose, a British captain, who is an unconditional prisoner, if such a one is in our possession; if not, a lieutenant under the same circumstances from among the prisoners at any of the posts, either in Pennsylvania or Maryland. So soon as you have fixed on the person, you will send him under a safeguard to Philadelphia, where the minister of war will order a proper guard to receive and conduct him to the place of his destination.

I

For your information respecting the officers, who are prisoners in our possession, I have ordered the commissary of prisoners to furnish you with a list of them. It will be forwarded with this. I need not mention to you, that every possible tenderness, that is consistent with the security of him, should be shown to the person whose unfortunate lot it may be to suffer. I am, dear Sir, &c.

SIR,

TO LIEUTENANT-GENERAL JAMES ROBERTSON.1

HEAD-QUARTERS, 4 May, 1782.

I had the honor to receive your letter of the 1st instant. Your Excellency is acquainted with the determination expressed in my letter of the 21st of April to Sir Henry Clinton. I have now to inform you, that, so far from receding from that resolution, orders are given to designate a British officer for retaliation. The time and place are fixed; but I still hope the result of your court-martial will prevent this dreadful alternative.

Sincerely lamenting the cruel necessity, which alone can induce so distressing a measure in the present instance, I do assure your Excellency, I am as earnestly desirous as you can be, that the war may carried on agreeable to the rules, which humanity formed, and the example of the politest nations

be

1 For nearly three years Sir Henry Clinton had from time to time solicited his recall, and at length the King granted him permission to return to Europe, which he received the last week in April. The command then devolved on General Robertson. He retained this station, however, only about a week, when Sir Guy Carleton arrived in New York, and took command of the British armies in America, as the permanent successor of Sir Henry Clinton.

recommends, and shall be extremely happy in agreeing with you to prevent or punish every breach of the rules of war within the sphere of our respective commands.

I am unacquainted with the circumstances of the detention of Badgely and Hatfield. The matter shall be examined into and justice done; but I must inform you, that in my opinion deserters, or characters, who for crimes they have committed are amenable to the civil power, cannot on either side be protected under the sanction of a flag. I do not pretend to say, the abovementioned persons are in that predicament.

Recrimination would be useless. I forbear, therefore, to mention numerous instances, which have stained the reputation of your arms, marked the progress of this war with unusual severity, and disgraced the honor of human nature itself. While I wave this ungrateful discussion, I repeat the assertion, that it is my most ardent desire, not only to soften the inevitable calamities of war, but even to introduce on every occasion as great a share of tenderness and humanity as can possibly be exercised in a state of hostility.' I have the honor to be, &c.

"In answer to my letter the British general informs me, that a court-martial is ordered for the trial of the persons complained of; but at the same time says, that those people offer, in justification of the fact, a number of instances of cruelty committed by us, and particularly in Monmouth county. Though this is by no means admitted, but on the contrary orders are given to designate and send to camp a British officer, who, if my demand is not complied with, will be executed; yet I cannot forbear observing to your Excellency, that, whilst we demand satisfaction from the enemy for the violences they commit, it becomes us to be particularly careful, that they have not a like claim on us; and I must beg you to make it known to all persons acting in a military capacity in your State, that I shall hold myself obliged to deliver up to the enemy, or otherwise to punish, such of them as shall commit any act, which is in the

« ZurückWeiter »