La Touche . La Touche (Considera- Latour. Attorney-General (Contract Laurel, The (Bottomry-Advertisement Lantour v. Attorney-General (Pleading Lawes v. Gibson (Specific performance Leather Cloth Co. (Limited), Apps., American Leather Cloth Co. (Li- mited), Resps. (Trade-mark-Mis- Lee, App., Riley, Resp. (Negligence— v. Jones (Guarantee—Surety), 81 | Leeds Banking Co. re, ex p. Prange (Bill of exchange-Notice of disho- Levi, er p., re Levi (Bankruptcy — Life Association of England (Limited), Life Association of England, re.-Thom- son's case (Winding up-Contribu- Lingwood v. Stowmarket Paper Co. Littlehampton Steam-ship Co., re Llanharry Hermatite Co. (Limited), re- Tothill's case (Company-Contribu- Llanharry Hermatite Iron Ore Co. (Li- mited), re.-Tothill's case (Company Lloyd v. Harrison (Sheriff-Escape- Invalid deed of arrangement), 364 Railway Co. (Specific performance- Locke v. Furze (Damages-Covenant- London, Birmingham, and South Staf- fordshire Bank (Limited), re (Trans- Long . Kent (Bequests of money and Longlands v. Andrews (Exemption r. Doling (Exemption from tolls), ciety, re (Benefit building society | Lovell, re (Allowance to bankrupt), 985 Low v. Routledge (Copyright-Alien Luff v. Lord (Purchase by trustee- Luke, in Goods of (Will-Incorpora- tion-Reference insufficient), 397 M. M'Call v. Taylor (Imperfect instrument sued on as a promissory note), 529 v. Great Western Railway Co. Mainprice v. Westley (Contract with Mair v. Himalayan Tea Co. (Limited) | (Jurisdiction-Specific performance Makepeace v. Rogers (Principal and teration), 5 Marylebone, Vestry of, Apps., Viret, Resp. (Drains, sufficiency of), 907 Mason v. Mitchell (Protection order- Produce of" lawful industry"), 89 v. Morley (Title deeds-Deposit Mason's Will, re (Moneys and securi- Massey, re (Taxation - Third party - Mathers v. Green (Patent Joint Mathey v. Wiseman (Lord Mayor's Mayor, &c. of Weymouth v. Nugent (Prerogative of Crown-Duties and Mayou, ex p., re Wood and Greenwood (Bankruptcy - Partnership—Joint Maythorne v. Palmer (Covenant not to Mercantile Marine Insurance Co. v. Tytherington (Marine insurance · Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v. Metropolitan Railway Co. v. Woodhouse Midland Railway Co., Apps., Badgworth, Overseers of, Resps. (Railway-Oc- cupation-Poor-Rateability), 14 Miller v. Biddle (Promissory note - Mills v. Borthwick (Limitations-Mar- Moore v. Barber (Husband and wife— Divorce à menså et thoro-Savings Morgan v. Gath (Statute of Frauds- - v. Morgan (Guardian ad litem- Morocco Land and Trading Co. (Li- Morrall v. Prichard (Practice-Motion v. Bell (Auction-Puffers), 897 Munro v. Wivenhoe and Britlingsea Murchie v. Black (Adjoining owners — Natal, Bishop of, re (Colonies—Metro- North Staffordshire Steel &c. Co. v. Camoys (Injunction-Landlord and Norway, The (Charterparty-Tender Nosworthy, in Goods of (Two wills— Nottley v. Nottley (Fund in court- v. Palmer (Fund in court-Disen- Oakden v. Pike (Specific performance Oakley v. Monck (Tenancy-Implied O'Hanlan v. Great Western Railway Onions v. Cohen (Specific performance Orton v. Cleveland Firebrick and Pot- Pain v. Terry (Motion for new trial— Parker v. Tootal (Will-Estates by im- Parkinson v. Hanbury (Taxation · Patent Artificial Stone Co. (Limited), re Perkins, ex p., Perkins, re (Bankruptcy Pew v. Metropolitan Board of Works (Rate-Apportionment), 346 Phelps v. London and North-western Railway Co. (Carriers-Passenger's luggage), 652 Philbrick's Settlement, re (Appointment by married woman), 558 Phillips v. James (Issue-Estate tail), 660 v. im Thurm (Bill of exchangeFictitious payee), 489 Pilgrim v. Knatchbull (Costs-County court-Concurrent jurisdiction), 389 Pole v. De la Pole (Tenant for lifeCompensation), 477 Pollack v. Birmingham, Wolverhamp ton, and Stour Valley Railway Co.Re Clarke's Estate (Married woman -Payment out of court to mortgagees), 7 Pope, App., Whalley, Resp. (ShopStall-Market), 444 Potter, ex p., re Barron (Bankruptcy, act of Unstamped deed), 49 Powell, App., Boraston, Resp. (Occupation franchise), 160 App., Farmer, Resp. (Occupation franchise), 162 App., Jones, Resp. (Borough franchise-Rates), 17 v. Powell (Testamentary suitIntestacy), 982 Power, re (Trust deed-RegistrationTime), 985 v. Power (Dissolution of marriage -Cruelty), 800 Priestly v. Fernie (Principal, agent, and creditors), 813 Pristwick v. Poley (Attorney-Power of-Action-Compromise), 583 Proctor v. Proctor, Smith, and Pitman (Wilful separation), 531 Proud v. Bates (Lease-Mines-Wayleave-Surface), 441 Pye v. Butterfield (Interrogatories— Ejectment-Forfeiture), 220 Pyke, re (Attorney and solicitor-Readmission), 504 v. Buckland, Inhabitants of (Highway-Costs), 821 v. Colvill (Prisons), 710 v. Curgerwen (Bigamy· - Seven years' absence), 984 v. Dant (Manslaughter-Culpable negligence-Vicious animals), 549 v. Debtors Drison for London and Middlesex, Governor of (Poor rateCivil process), 970 v. Denton, Inhabts. of Township of (Highway-Indictment-Costs), 172 v. East Stoke, Inhabitants of (Indictment-Certiorari), 809 v. Fisher (Malicious injury to property), 983 v. Giles (False pretences - Evidence), 119 v. Godmanchester, Local Board of Health of Borough of (SewerDrain), 63 v. Hall Dare (Sewers rate-Poor rate-Deductions), 59 v. Johnson (Highway, non-repair of), 467 v. Johnson (Indecent assault― Consent), 532 450 144 v. Joyce (Forgery), 472 v. Levi (Bankruptcy—Evidence), v. Mullany (Perjury), 492 v. Mutters (Larceny-Adulterer), -v. Naylor (False pretences), 910 on the Prosecution of Committee of Visitors of the Cambridgeshire, Isle of Ely, and Borough of Cambridge Lunatic Asylum, Apps., Fulbourn, Overseers of, Resps. (Poor rate), 620 v. Purdey (Conviction-AppealCosts), 153 v. Redman (Threats with intent to extort money), 960 v. Robertson (Menaces, demanding money with), 96 v. Robinson (Uttering medals resembling coin), 452 - v. Rowton (Evidence-Character -Reputation), 325 v. Brett (Covenant-Condition precedent), 377 v. Evans (Award-Enlargement of time), 15, 321 v. Roberts (Intended parol gift of money), 992 Robins, re (Attorney and solicitor— Readmission), 504 Robinson v. London and South-western Railway Co. (Declaration of value), 390 Robson v. Flight (Trust-Power-Disclaimer), 147 Rogers, ex p. (Articled clerk—Illness), 504 re (Feme covert-Personal estate), 1038 Rolfe v. Gregory (Breach of trustLaches), 98 Rowe v. Rowe (Judicial separation— Withdrawal of wife from bed), 568 v. Tonkin (Time-Demurrer), 849 Rowley v. Rowley (Petition for dissolution), 532 Rummens v. Robins (Vendor and purchaser-Offer-Withdrawal), 631 Ryland . May (Writ of trial-Jurisdiction) 139 Ryves, in the Matter of the Petition of, v. Att.-Gen. (Legitimacy-Declaration Act), 878 S. Sacker v. Chidley (“ Possession, order, and disposition" of bankrupt), 654 Sadd, re (Solicitor and client-Retainer -Negligence of solicitor), 774 St. Helen's Smelting Co. (Limited) v. Tipping (Nuisance- Actionable injury), 785 St. Paul v. Heath (Accumulations— Thellusson Act), 903 Salomons v. Pender (Principal and agent-Commission), 432 Saunders, in Goods of (Seaman's will), 1027 and Waine v. Merewether (Estoppel-Recitals in deed), 655 v. Shaw (Perjury—Jurisdiction | Savile v. Kinnaird (Will-Sale-Purof justices), 415 chase money), 195 v. Smith (Manslaughter-Master Savin v. Hoylake Railway Co. (Graand servant), 695 tuitous service), 934 v. Worksop, Local Board of Health of (General district rate), 1015 Rewe v. Whitmore (Receipts and judg ments-Evidence), 722 barrister-Appeal), 115 v. Berry (Unsigned deed of composition-Inequality), 510 v. Key (Will-Implied trust), 819 v. London Dock Co. (AccidentNegligence), 204 Scottish Universal Finance Bank, re.Ship's case (Practice · Contributory), 254 Scottish and Universal Finance Bank, re-Ship's case (Register-Shareholder-Variance), 331 Scottish and Universal Finance Bank (Limited), re (Winding up-CostsPriority), 619 Semenza e. Brinsley (Principal and agent-Set-off-Factor), 409 Shaw . Bunny (Purchase by second mortgagee-Redemption), 99 Shrewsbury, Earl of, v. Keightley (Leasing power), 1002 Shuttleworth v. Le Fleming (Prescription-Free fishery), 841 Sidney r. Sidney (Wife's petition-Per- ―r. South Staffordshire Waterworks Skeggs, re (Will-Conversion-Money Stokes v. City Offices Co. (Ancient lights -Injunction), 560 Stone v. Strange (Inspection of letters -Breach of promise), 164 Stubley v. Lancashire and Yorkshire | Tucker v. Burrow (Advancement-Loco Railway Co. (Accidents at level cross- parentis-Illegitimate grandchild), ings), 954 Sumner v. Bromilow (Landlord and Sutton v. Great Western Railway Co.Sutton v. South-eastern Railway Co. (Packed parcels), 879 v. South-eastern Railway Co. (Injunction-Packed parcels), 935 Sweetland v. Sweetland (Will-Execution), 182 Swift v. Swift (Custody of children), 148 v. Swift (Custody of infant-Public policy), 458 Swire v. Leach (Distress-Privilege), 179 Symonds v. Wilkes (Restraint against anticipation), 659 Symons v. George (Trust deed-Valilidity at eommon law), 713 ex p., re Thorp (Broker's agreement-Statute of Frauds), 49 v. Cross (Judgment-Charge on lands-Execution), 384 Thompson v. Hakewill (Joint demise by tenants in common), 732 v. Smith (Ne exeat regno-Untaken accounts), 276 Thomson, in Goods of (Will-CodicilParol evidence), 960 Thorne, in Goods of (Will—Actual military service), 569 Tomlison v. Leigh (Rectification of settlement), 962 Topping, ex p., re Levey and Robson (Bankruptcy —Partnership -Proof by co-partner), 210 Travis v. Illingworth (Trustee-Retiring-Appointment), 215 Trayes v. Worms (General averageCharterparty), 639 Straker v. Ewing (Charge of fraud-Trickett v. Greene (Compulsory refeCosts), 127 Stuart v. Great Western Railway Co. and Saunders (Bill in aid of action), 627 rence-Matter of account-Issue of fraud), 1037 Trimnell, in Goods of (Will-Execution), 248 525 W. Wakefield v. Buccleugh, Duke of (Practice-Injunction-Undertaking), 523 v. Llanelly Railway and Dock Co. (Award-Specific performance), 456 Walford v. Gray (Marriage-Appointment-Settlement), 106 v. Grey (Treaty of marriageAppointment-Settlement), 473 Walker v. Brogden (Libel-Newspaper -Bona fide comment), 671 -v. Nevill (Bankruptcy Act, 1861, sects. 192, 197), 246 Wallace v. Attorney-General (Succession duty-Domicil) 937 Ward, App., Gray, Resp. (Floating bridge-Tolls), 738 Warwick and Worcester Railway Co., re. De Beauvoir's case (Winding up-Misfeasance-Directors), 967 Watson, App., Martin, Resp. (“ Instruments of gaming"), 321 Webb v. Wardle (Practice-Death of co-defendant-Revivor), 278 Webster v. Donaldson (Vendor and purchaser Growing crops — Action), 404 Weeks v. Stourton (Practice - Foreclosure Affidavits of documents), 278 Were, App., Devon, Clerk of Peace of, Resp. (County rate- Police rate), 322 Weston v. Collins (Lease-Right of preemption-Title), 190 Wheatley v. Westminster Brymbo Coal Co. (Arbitration-Staying proceedings), 232 Whitehead v. Lynes (Practice - Receiver-Fi. fa.-Damages), 74 Whitmore v. Wakerley (Deed of compo sition-Fi. fa.), 182 Whittaker v. Lowe (Majority of creditors-Secured creditors), 530 Whymper v. Harney (Factory Acts— Crinoline manufactory), 269 Wickham v. Bath, Marquis of (Mortmain-Reservation of interest), 988 v. Wing (Power-Insolvency of donee), 424 Williams, in Goods of (Will-Foot or end), 982 Wilson v. Hart (Notice — Covenant), | Wraithby, Claim of, re (Reviewing tax ation), 954 Wrey's Settlement, re (Tenant for life -Conveyance-Investment), 296 Wyatt v. Great Western Railway Co. (Highway-Crossing), 825 Y. Young v. Fletcher (Act of bankruptcy v. Smith (Covenant to settle afteracquired property), 963 A TABLE OF THE PUBLIC STATUTES PASSED IN THE SESSION 1865-28 & 29 VICTORIA, ABSTRACTED IN THIS VOLUME. CAP. III. CAP. XXVI. An Act for the Protection of Inventions and Designs ex- An Act to provide for Superannuation Allowances to Officers hibited at certain Industrial Exhibitions in the United of Unions in Ireland (26th May, 1865) Kingdom (27th March, 1865) CAP. VIII. .. 1 CAP. XXVII. An Act to amend the Election Petitions Act, 1848, in certain An Act for awarding Costs in certain Cases of Private Bills (26th May, 1865) Particulars (7th April, 1865) CAP. IX. ib. .. CAP. XXX. ib. An Act to enlarge the Powers of the Governor-General of An CAP. XVIII. ib. .. CAP. XXXVI. 7 Act to amend the Law relating to the Registration of CAP. XXXVII. An Act to extend the Period for borrowing the Sum authorised to be raised under the Metropolitan Main Drainage Ex- An Act to extend to the Court of Chancery of the County tension Act, 1863 (9th May, 1865) |