Ꭼ Ꭱ Ꭱ Ꭺ Ꭲ Ꭺ . PAGE 41. n. 2. add Laws v. Rand, 27 L. J., C. P., 76. Here no time less than six years is deemed unreasonable. 53. n. 3. add But the question whether or not there has been an infringement of the patent is for the jury; De la Rue v. Dickenson, 7 E. & B. 738. add See Hills v. London Gas Light Co., 27 L. J., Ex., 60. 53. n. 4. 101. n. 5. add See also Bowes v. Foster, 2 H. & N. 779. 106. n. 2. 109. n. 1. add Carter v. Carter, 27 L. J., Ch., 74, 84, 85, per Wood, V. C. 120. n. 3. add Sutton v. Devonport, 27 L. J., C. P., 54. 121. n. 3. after Toogood v. Spyring, add Whitfield v. South East. Rail. Co., 31 Law Times, 113, Q. B. 124. n. 7. after Roberts v. Haines, insert S. C. affirmed in Ex. Ch., Haines v. Roberts, 7 E. & B. 625; also, after Rowbotham v. Wilson, insert S. C. affirmed in Ex. Ch., 27 L. J., Q. B., 61; also, at end add Rogers v. Taylor, 2 H. & N. 828; 27 L. J., Ex., 173, S. C.; Dugdale v. Robertson, 3 Kay &. J. 695. add Rogers v. Taylor, 2 H. & N. 828; 27 L. J., Ex., 173, S. C. after Colman v. Anderson, add Williams v. Eyton, 27 L. J., Ex., 176; 2 H. & N. 771, S. C. 125. n. 3. 131. n. 1. 136. n. 5. 152. n. 3. at end insert S. C., nom. Gibson v. Doeg, 2 H. & N. 615. 170. n. 4. add at end It does apply to a case of felonious wounding with intent to disfigure, R. v. Smith, 4 Jur., N. S., 395. 272. 280. n. 5. 194. n. 2. add at end S. C., 2 Com. B., N. S., 488. 200. n. 1. 229. n. 4. add R. v. Jennings, 1 Dears. & Bell, 447, where held, that a prisoner charged with stealing as a servant might be convicted of simple larceny. after Haigh v. Ousey, cited in line 26 of n., insert S. C., 7 E. & B. 578. add Roberts v. Eberhardt, 27 L. J., C. P., 70. 285. n. 1. 287. n. 3. 303. n. 3. 316. n. 1. 338. n. 1. add See also Kenrick v. Horder, 7 E. & B. 628. 395. n. 1. 448. n. 5. add Suter v. Burrell, 2 H. & N. 867; 27 L. J., Ex., 193, S. C. add See Robson v. Crawley, 2 H. & N. 766; S. C., nom. Robson v. Cooke, 27 L. J., Ex., 153, per Pollock, C. B. h |