Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB

1

often taken merely by laying the hand on the Missal. The Lombards swore lesser oaths by consecrated weapons, the greater on the Gospels, but it is not certain whether they kissed the book." An oath ratified by contact with a sacred object was a corporal oath'; the object was the halidome, the equivalent of the Greek öpкos, oath and object being identified. No doubt contact by means of the lips was at an early date regarded as more efficacious than contact by means of the hand, and thus the more primitive notion was superimposed upon that of adoration. In Islam the rite is that usual in adoration and does not include the kiss. In modern England a detail to be noted is that the hand holding the book must be ungloved. The book varies according to the creed; a Jew is sworn on the OT; a Roman Catholic on the Douai Testament. The term upon the NT, has been regular in England since the 14th cent. at least.*

7. Kissing sacred objects.-Kissing the image of a god was a recognized rite of adoration among both Greeks and Romans. The early Arabs had the same rite. On leaving and entering the house they kissed the house-gods. In the Eleusinian Mysteries the sacred objects were kissed. The toe of St. Peter's statue is kissed by Roman Catholics. The Muslim kissed the Ka'ba at Mecca. In the wall there is a black stone believed by Muslims to be one of the stones of paradise. It was once white, but has been blackened by the kisses of sinful but believing lips. The Hebrews often lapsed into the idolatrous practice; Hosea speaks of kissing calves'; the image of Baal was kissed. Together with kneeling (q.v.), the kiss comprises belief and homage. The Hebrews kissed the floor of the Temple," and to this day, in the Hebrew ritual, it is the practice to kiss the şişith of the tallith when putting it on, the mezuzah at the door when enter-book,' employed with special reference to the oath ing or leaving, and the Scroll of the Law when about to read or to bless it. It is even customary among Jews, though not obligatory, when a Hebrew book is dropped, to kiss it. Kissing the Book is a case, surviving (as a real living ceremony) in the highest civilization, of primitive conceptions of the oath. These were expressed in various forms."

One method of charging an oath with supernatural energy is to touch, or to establish some kind of contact with, a holy object on the occasion when the oath is taken.'8

The view of Westermarck, that mana or baraka is thus imparted to the oath, is further developed when the name of a supernatural being is introduced; thus the modern English ceremony retains the words, 'So help me God.' A complementary aspect is supplied by forms whose object is to prevent perjury.

The Angami Nagas 'place the barrel of a gun, or a spear, between their teeth, signifying by this ceremony that, if they do not act up to their agreement, they are prepared to fall by either of the two weapons.'9 In Tibetan law-courts the great oath' is taken by the person placing a holy scripture on his head, and sitting on the reeking hide of an ox and eating a part of the ox's heart.'10 'Hindus swear on a copy of the Sanskrit haribans (Harivarśa].' 11

Among Anglican clergy it is customary to kiss the cross of the stole before putting it on. The Catholic Church enjoins the duty of kissing relics, the Gospels, the Cross, consecrated candles and palms, the hands of the clergy, and the vestments and utensils of the liturgy. It was formerly part of the Western use that the celebrant should kiss the host. He now kisses the corporal. The altar is regarded as typical of Christ, and as such is kissed by the celebrant. In the Greek Church relics are kissed.

The kiss of peace' was in mediæval times the subject of a curious simplification of ritual, by which it became, as it were, a material object. In the 12th or 13th cent., for reasons of convenience, the instrumentum pacis, or osculatorium, was introduced. This was a plaque of metal, ivory, or wood, carved with various designs, and fitted with a handle. It was brought to the altar for the celebrant to kiss, and then to each of the congregation at the rails. This is the pax-board or pax-brede of the museums.7

ally it implies close contact or absolute reconcilia-
tion or acquiescence; to kiss the dust is to be
overthrown; to kiss the rod is to submit to chas-
tisement; to kiss the cup is to drink. Philo-
stratus inspired Ben Jonson's image of the loved
is a light one.
one leaving a kiss in the cup.10 Abutterfly kiss'

8. Metaphor and myth.-The metaphorical apThe European ceremony of kissing the book of plications of the idea of the kiss are not numerous. the New Testament after taking the oath in a law-In some phrases it expresses a light touch. Genercourt connects in its material form rather with the kiss of reverence, as instanced in the kissing of relics and sacred objects generally. But in essence there is still some of the primitive sense of responsibility by contact, rendered stronger by the invocation of the name of the deity. Derived indirectly from the Græco-Roman ritual kissing of sacred objects and the Hebrew reverence for the Scroll of the Law, it was early developed by the Christians into their characteristic ceremony of oath-taking. Chrysostom writes:

'But do thou, if nothing else, at least reverence the very book thou holdest out to be sworn by, open the gospel thou takest in thy hands to administer the oath, and, hearing what Christ therein saith of oaths, tremble and desist.'12

Ingeltrude is represented repeating the words:
These four Evangelists of Christ our God which I hold in my
In the former quotation the act of kissing can
only be inferred from the word 'reverence.' The
holding of the book is less definite than the Hebrew
rite of placing the hands on the scroll when
swearing. Even in the Middle Ages an oath was
1 J. Wellhausen, Reste arab. Heidentumes, Berlin, 1887,
p. 105.
2 C. A. Lobeck, Aglaophamus, Königsberg, 1829, p. 135.
8 SBE vi. (1900) p. xiii.
Hos 132, 1 K 1918.
6 Jacobs, loc. cit.
8 lb. 119.

own hands and kiss with my mouth.'13

5 Suk. 53a.

7 See MI ii. 118 ff.

9 lb., quoting J. Butler, Travels and Adventures in Assam, London, 1855, p. 154.

10 L. A. Waddell, Buddhism of Tibet, London, 1895, p. 569, note 7.

11 MI ii. 120.

12 Ad pop. Antiochenum homil. xv. 5 (PG xlix. 160).

13 Du Cange, s.v. 'Juramentum,' iv. 451.

nexion between the emotional gesture and the
Folklore developed in interesting ways the con-
ideas of magic and charms. Relics were kissed
to regain health. Conversely, the kiss of a sacred
person, a specialized form of his touch, cures the
leper, as in the case of St. Martin." Some similar
association of thought may attach to the nursery
practice of kissing the place to make it well";
gamesters used to kiss the cards in order to secure
luck with them; an Alpine peasant kisses his hand
before receiving a present. Pages in the French
Court kissed any article which they were given
to carry. A famous instance of symbolism is the
kiss bestowed by Brutus on his mother-earth-an
application of the kiss of greeting. But in German
1 Nyrop, p. 119.
2 Du Cange, s.v. Juramentum.'
3 The right hand is placed on the Qur'an, and the head is
brought down touching the book.

19

4 OED, 8.v. Book,' quoting document of 1389: 'Eche of hem had sworen on pe bok.'

5 Thurston, loc. cit.

7 Thurston, loc. cit.

6 Nyrop, p. 120.
8 CI. Ps. 8510.

9 Similarly in slang, to kiss the stocks, the clink, the counter;

to kiss the hare's foot be late.

[blocks in formation]

folklore to kiss the ground is a synonym for to die. The privilege in English folk-custom known as kissing under the mistletoe' is a Christmas festal practice connected by Frazer with the licence of the Saturnalia. It may have originated independently as an expression of festivity. Greek, Latin, and Teutonic mythology employed the motive of unbinding a spell by a kiss-le fier baiser of Arthurian romances, which changes a dragon into the maiden who had been enchanted. The Sleeping Beauty awakened by the kiss of the lover is a widely-distributed motive. An analogy, without actual derivation, is to be found in many primitive cases of cancelling a tabu. Thus in Australian ceremony bodily contact, analogous to the kiss, in various forms, removes the tabu between two persons, such as the celebrant and the subject of a rite. An analogy may be seen between Teutonic and early Christian ritual in the connexion drawn out by Grimm between minnedrinking and the kiss. He finds this both in sorcery and in sacrificial rites. Closely parallel to the magical power of the kiss in breaking tabu and restoring to consciousness is the myth-motive in which a kiss_produces both forgetfulness and remembrance. This capacity is evidently based on human experience, and is significant in connexion with the practice of the kiss in religion. It brings to one focus the kiss of love and the kiss of adoration. In the psychology of adolescence the kiss produces a forgetfulness of old conditions and awakens the subject to a new life. The kiss appears to have no symbol in art. European children and adolescents express it in writing by a cross, perhaps merely an accidental choice. The Slavic Jews style an insincere kiss as a 'kiss with dots.' Some Rabbis explain that Esau's kiss was insincere (Gn 334), and every letter of the word pen is dotted by the Massoretes." LITERATURE.-E. B. Tylor, Salutations' in EBrl H. Ling Roth, in JAI xix. [1890]; H. Thurston, in CE, 8.v.; J. Jacobs, in JE, 8.v.; H. Havelock Ellis, "The Origins of the Kiss' in Sexual Selection in Man, Philadelphia, 1905; C. Lom broso, in Nouvelle Revue, xxi. [1897]; C. Nyrop, The Kiss and its History, tr. W. F. Harvey, London, 1901; J. Neil, Kissing: its Curious Bible Mentions, London, 1885; E. W. Hopkins,

'The Sniff-kiss in ancient India,' JAOS xxviii. [1907] 120-134. For an elaborate schematization of the love-kiss in India see R. Schmidt, Beitr. zur ind. Erotik, Leipzig, 1902, pp. 453–477. A. E. CRAWLEY.

rock-caves of the Buddhist period and a few ancient Hindu temples.

LITERATURE.-BG xix. [1885] 13 f., 472, 516, 610, xxi. [1884] 10, xxiii. [1884] 7, 675, xxiv. [1886] 8 f. For the Bezwada caves, J. Fergusson and J. Burgess, The Cave Temples of India, London, 1880, p. 95 ff.; S. H. Bilgrami and C. Willmott, Historical and Descriptive Sketch of the Nizam's Dominions, Bombay, 1883, i. 11 f. W. CROOKE.

KIZIL BASH.-Kizil Bash, 'Red Heads,' is the name by which are denoted the members of a sect distributed throughout the whole of Asia Minor. They call themselves 'Alevis; their nickname, which in Persia and Afghanistan was and is given to other peoples also, originates doubtless from the colour of their head-dress. Their total number is estimated at more than a million; they form an important section of the population of the vilayets of Sivas (about 305,000), Erzerum (107,000), Angora, and Mamurete ul-Aziz (Kharput), and in certain districts constitute even the majority. Their language is Turkish or Kurdish. Though reckoned officially as Musalman Sunnites, in reality they are not such; they practise Islamism only in a formal way to avoid persecution. When they think they are in safety, they do not attend the mosques, read the Qur'an, say the prayers, or perform the Muhammadan ablutions. Except in the presence of a Sunnite, their women are not veiled. They drink wine, they do not observe Ramadan, and some of them do not practise circumcision or shave the head and other parts of the body as the Turks do. Moreover, they cherish a profound aversion to the Turks, and regard them as unclean; when they are obliged to entertain them, they even go so far as to pollute the dishes with which they serve them. On the other hand, they show great goodwill in their villages towards the Christians. They have secret beliefs and practices which they reveal only with extreme reluctance, and no one has hitherto been able to penetrate, except very imperfectly, the mystery with which they are surrounded.

Their sect, like some Christian Churches, has called dédéhs, whose dignity is hereditary from a hierarchical organization. They have priests father to son, and who are the necessary intermediaries between God and the rest of the com

KISTNA (Skr. Krsna, 'the dark one"). One munity. This sacerdotal caste is subject to a of the great rivers of S. India, which, like the obedience to two patriarchs, who are regarded as These themselves render species of bishops. Godavari (q.v.) and Kāverī, to which it is inferior descendants of 'Ali, and who are invested with a in sanctity, flows nearly across the entire penin-sacrosanct authority. One of these is the Shaikh sula from W. to E. It rises in the Mahabaleswar plateau of the W. Ghāts, only 40 miles from the Arabian Sea.

At its source is an ancient temple of Siva, inside which the infant stream pours out of a stone formed in the shape of a cow's mouth (gaumukhi). This place, known as Kṛṣṇabãi, the lady Kṛṣṇa,' is a favourite resort of pilgrims. Fifteen miles down stream is the old Buddhist town of Wai, one of the most sacred places in its course, with a group of cave-temples and several later Hindu shrines (BG xix. [1885] 610 ff.). Farther on it passes close by the town of Sātāra, Karād, or Karhad, at the junction with the Koyna and Mahuli, where it is joined by the Yenna. In the Bijapur District, Sangam, at its junction with the Mahaprabha, possesses a temple of some sanctity, dedicated to Siva under the title of Sangamesvara, lord of the sacred meeting of the waters,' the site of an annual religious fair. Thence passing through the dominions of the Nizam of Haidarabad, it reaches the Bay of Bengal in the British Kistna District. Here Bezwada contains some 1 Nyrop, p. 130. 2 Ib. 94.

3 J. Grimm, Teutonic Mythology, tr. J. S. Stally brass, London,

1882-88, p. 1102.

4 Jacobs, loc. cit.

of Khubyar (about 34 miles to the N. W. of Sivas), a popular place of pilgrimage. It is certain that the Kizil Bash possess a sacred book, probably liturgic in character, but as yet no part of it has been made public.

Three superimposed stratifications in the religion of the Kizil Bash may be distinguished.

(1) There is an old pagan foundation going back to the ancient Anatolian beliefs, tinged with Persian Mazdaism, which were practised in the country before its conversion to Christianity. The Kizil Bash regard certain heights or certain rocks as sacred, e.g. near Kara Hissar (Taylor, Journal Royal Geogr. Society, xxxviii. [1868] 297), and on holidays they sacrifice sheep and fowls on these summits. The trees which grow there-usually pines-are surrounded with superstitious regard, and no one is allowed to carry an axe near them (cf. F. and E. Cumont, Voyage dans le Pont, Brussels, 1906, p. 172 ff.). The Kizil Bash, like the ancient Mazdæans, worship streams and especially springs. They also venerate fire; when they build a house, they light a fire with great ceremony, and this must be kept burning as long as the house remains standing. The place of honour is near the hearth, and to spit there is sacrilege. A fire

altar hewn out in the rock is still the object of devotion at Manasgerd (C. Wilson, Handbook of Asia Minor, London, 1895, p. 250). They worship the sun at its rising and setting, and a day in which it does not appear is for them a day of mourning. They also worship the moon.

Everybody in the East accuses the Kizil Bash of giving themselves up to orgies in their nocturnal ceremonies (cf. below), when, the lights out, each man has commerce with a woman taken by chance. That is why the Turks call them, in derision, terah sonderan, 'extinguishers of the light.' It is difficult to know what degree of truth there is in this imputation. But it is remarkable that the same promiscuity was, during their feast of 1st January, laid to the reproach of the Paulicians in the 9th cent., who were distributed throughout the same regions as the Kizil Bash of to-day (Manichæan formula of abjuration, in PG i. 1469: μετὰ δὲ τὴν ἑσπερινὴν μέθην ἀποσβεννύουσι τὰ φῶτα, σαρκικῶς τε ἀλλήλοις ενασελγαίνουσι, καὶ μεδεμιᾶς ὅλως φειδομένοις φύσεως ἢ συγγενίας ἢ ἡλικίας). It is possible that those supposed acts of debauchery may be an inheritance from the sacred prostitution of the worship of Ma and Anaïtis. This would also be true of the custom, if it were well attested, of offering a young girl every year to the dédéhs, whose son, they say, if one is born, becomes a priest, or whose daughter must remain a virgin and set herself apart for the cult (Cte de Cholet, Arménie, Kurdistan et Mésopotamie, Paris, 1892, p. 96).

(2) The influence of Christianity is evident both in the beliefs and in the rites of the sect. The Kizil Bash teach that God is One in Three Persons, and that the principal incarnation of God, before 'Ali, is Jesus Christ, the Saviour of the world, who intercedes with God for humanity. They are devoted to Mary, who is, they believe, the Mother of God, and who conceived without ceasing to be a virgin. At the same time, they acknowledge the existence of five powers, lower than the Trinity, mediators between the Supreme Being and man, analogous to the yatim of the Nosairis, a kind of archangels which are perhaps derived from the Iranian Amesha Spentas (q.v.). Moreover, they assume the existence of twelve ministers of God, who correspond to the twelve apostles and the twelve nagibs of the Nosairis. Unlike the Yezidis, they offer no worship to Satan, whom they regard as the irreconcilable adversary of God. Like the Nosairis, they believe that at the end of the ages the spirit of evil will come to fight a final battle against the last incarnation of Jesus. Mazdæan dualism is here combined with Christian ideas.

The Kizil Bash have a ceremony which they celebrate by night on certain holidays-the 10th of the month of Muharram was mentioned to the present writer-and also at irregular intervals, when a dédéh visits their villages.

Accompanying himself with a musical instrument, the priest who officiates sings prayers in honour of 'Ali, Jesus, Moses, and David. . . . The priest has a willow cane which suggests the barsom [q.v.] of the Avesta. He dips it in water while he says

the prayers. The water thus consecrated is afterwards dis

tributed throughout the houses. In the course of the ceremony those who take part make public confession of their sins, after

the manner of the early Christians. The priest prescribes various penances, frequently in the form of a fine, in money or in kind. Then they put out the lights and engage in lamenta tions over the faults of which they have been guilty. When the lights are re-kindled, the priest pronounces the absolution; then he takes some slices of bread and a cup of wine or some analogous liquid, consecrates them solemnly, dips the bread in the wine, and distributes it to those of the company who have obtained absolution. Among the Kurd Kizil Bash a sheep is sacrificed according to a certain rite after the public confession, and portions of it are distributed by the priest along

with the bread and the wine. . . The Kizil Bash celebrate

Easter on the same Sunday as the Armenians, and they pay homage to several Christian saints, as, for instance, St. Sergius' (Grenard, in JA x. iii. 516).

[ocr errors]

(3) What the Kizil Bash have borrowed from Islāmism affiliates them with the Shi'ites rather than with the Sunnites. They have adopted the legend of 'Ali, whom they regard as an incarnation of God the Father, while Jesus is an incarnation of the Son. Like the Shi'ites, they fast during the first twelve days of Muharram, and bewail the death of Hasan and Husain. Some say that they regard Muhammad as the hypostasis of the Spirit, the Paraclete, but the veneration which they show towards the prophet is only formal; in reality they refuse to credit him with any divine inspiration.

To sum up: the religion of the Kizil Bash is in many respects a survival of the ancient paganism of Anatolia, which in the east of the peninsula was deeply marked by the die of Mazdæism (cf. F. Cumont, Religions orientales dans le paganisme romain, Paris, 1909, p. 213 ff., Eng. tr., Chicago, 1911, p. 143 1.). The country population of these regions was imperfectly and slowly converted to Christianity, and we know that colonies of Magi dwelt there until at least the end of the 5th cent. (cf. F. Cumont, Textes et monuments figurés relatifs aux mystères de Mithra, Brussels, 1895-99, i. 10), and perhaps until the Musalman conquest. Further, in the 12th cent., Nerses Shnorhali gives interesting details regarding the Sons of the Sun,' who worshipped the stars, and who venerated, among trees, the poplar (F. C. Conybeare, The Key of Truth, Oxford, 1898, p. 159). In the 8th and 9th centuries it was in the countries inhabited by the Kizil Bash that the dualistic Paulicians (q.v.) found their most numerous adherents, and even after their extermination by the Byzantine emperors their teaching probably did not cease to exert an influence there. Finally, the relations of the Kizil Bash with Shi'ism are probably explained by their forced conversion to Islam under the Seljuks, at a time when the Persian influence was powerful, perhaps also by the transportation of Shi'ites of Turkish origin into Kurdistan in the time of the Sultāns Salim 1. and Sulaiman I. (16th cent.). It is much to be desired that a copy of the sacred book of the sect should be obtained, or that a transcription should be made at least of the hymns of its service. It would then be possible to clear up the mysteries surrounding this very curious religion which retains numerous disciples even in our own times.

LITERATURE.-R. Oberhummer and H. Zimmerer, Durch will be found from the more ancient authors; F. Grenard (Consul of France at Sivas) has collected some new and accurate information in JA x. iii. [1904] 511-522. The writer of this article has added here some facts gathered by himself among the Kizil Bash of the region of Amazia in 1900.

Syrien und Kleinasien, Berlin, 1899, p. 393 ff., where citations

FRANZ CUMONT.

KNEELING.-Kneeling may be described as a natural reaction to the emotions of self-abasement and supplication. As such, it has been observed among unsophisticated peoples. In a less degree only than prostration, it symbolizes inferiority and dependence, by the abandonment of the erect posture of human active life. According to Tylor,1 kneeling as a ceremonial posture prevails in the 'middle stages of culture.' The same limitation, however, applies to prostration as still practised in Islam and Hinduism. Both in the middle and in the higher stages kneeling is more or less constantly associated with a third gesture-bowing, a symbolic expression of respect or reverence. It would be quite erroneous to derive' ceremonial kneeling from prostration, or bowing from kneeling. But certain forms of the bow, surviving in modern etiquette, include some bending of one or both knees such are the curtsey, still made by ladies at court, and the bow of ceremony in which one

1 Art. 'Salutations' in EBrll xxiv. 94.

foot is moved backward while the knee of the other tress.1 Hannah stood and prayed. It was the leg is bent.

Primitive peoples hardly developed kneeling as a ceremonial posture in either of the two spheres in which it obtains-social etiquette and religious ritual. What generally corresponds to kneeling in the latter sphere is squatting on the heels, still the Muslim mode of kneeling and certainly a primitive posture, though originally expressing attention rather than reverence. It is employed largely by the Australian natives in their ceremonies.1 As the stages of the higher barbarism are reached, kneeling appears, developed from the natural supplicatory posture. In Central Africa it is a tribute paid to rank. When a chief passes, the native drops on his knees and bows his head. When two grandees meet, the junior leans forward, bends his knees, and places the palms of his hands on the ground.'2 At higher stages prostration is usual among Oriental peoples, except the Chinese, who_bow, or kneel and bow, according to the rank. To kings they kneel. It is chiefly in Semitic and Græco Roman culture that kneeling has been prevalent as a ceremonial posture.

In Greek and Roman civilization much prominence was given to the suppliant and the act of supplication, just as was the case in the Middle Ages with the practice of sanctuary. In both ceremonial customs kneeling, the natural posture of earnest entreaty and self-abandonment, was the constant attitude. Such phrases as 'nixæ genibus' (Plaut. Rud. III. iii. 33) and 'genibus minor' (Horace, Ep. I. xii. 28) are common in metaphor. It seems that in the Assyrian States not only subjection to kings but worship of gods was expressed by kneeling. In the latter case it may be assumed as certain that the attitude has no essential connexion with prayer, as in the Christian use; the king and the god alike were, it appears, pre-eminently despotic, and court and temple ceremonial had similar forms expressing similar ideas, the chief of which was submission.

Among organized religions Christianity alone has given special significance to the posture of kneeling. During half its history the posture signified penitence; during the rest it signified prayer. At the change (marked by the Reformation) it was, by a curious association of ideas, identified with adoration or idolatry.

The process by which Christianity adopted kneeling as a ceremonial posture is somewhat uncertain in detail. The Hebrews, deriving many elements of their worship from Mesopotamian cults, may be supposed to have adopted kneeling from that source, and as a posture of humility it is found in the OT. The Talmud speaks of bending the knee with the face touching the grounda still more Oriental gesture, almost identical with prostration. Elijah on Carmel put his face between his knees -a similar posture. Kneeling to Baal 8 may have been a form of prostration. Kneeling in prayer is mentioned in the cases of Solomon, Ezra, and Daniel. At the dedication of the Temple Solomon knelt on his knees with his hands spread up to heaven. Ezra fell upon his knees and spread out his hands unto the Lord. Daniel knelt upon his knees and prayed. The posture in those three cases seems identical with the Christian.

7

[blocks in formation]

same in the time of Christ; He said, 'When ye
stand praying.' In the parable_both Pharisee
and publican stood to pray.3
The posture of
supplication or homage referred to in Mk 1017 and
Lk 58 (πроσkúvησis) seems to be complete prostra-
tion. Kneeling in prayer occurs once only in the
Gospels, when Christ Himself knelt during the
Agony.

4

The first Christians may be assumed to have, like the Founder, usually stood in prayer, following the practice which was common to both Hebrew and Græco-Roman ritual. The catacomb frescoes represent the orantes standing with outstretched arms. But earlier than this, at the period represented by the Acts, kneeling appears to have become a characteristic posture. When Stephen knelt just before his death, after the stoning, no posture of prayer can be assumed. It seems faith that it was applied indiscriminately on every as if the posture were so regular a feature of the occasion by the chroniclers. But there is no doubt that the attitude was a feature of the faith at knelt and prayed with them all; we kneeled this time. Peter knelt down and prayed; Paul down on the shore and prayed.' 7 For St. Paul kneeling and praying are synonymous. In view of the catacomb evidence and of that of the next stage, it is clear that there is some prejudice in the evidence of Acts. But clearly there is a presumption in favour of the early adoption of kneeling for some aspect of Christian worship. The facts may perhaps be reconciled in this way: the pioneers of the faith probably emphasized the penitent and suppliant posture (which was familiar both to Jews and to Greeks and Romans) on all possible occasions; but, when the faith attained a secure position, the posture was relegated to its traditional use. The case would thus be a microcosm of the change of attitude shown by Christianity itself as a whole.

10

middle of the 2nd cent.) kneeling had become By the time of the Shepherd of Hermas (the familiar in Christian prayer and worship. The position has been summed up thus for the anteNicene period:

"The recognized attitude for prayer, liturgically speaking, was standing, but kneeling was early introduced for penitential, and perhaps ordinary ferial, seasons, and was frequently, though not necessarily always, adopted in private prayer.'ll

The strange thing is that in neither the pre- nor the post-Pentecostal period has kneeling a peniten. tial aspect. This may possibly have been a special development of the Hebrew solemn use of the posture, as in mourning, or of the Græco-Roman and Mesopotamian use in supplication or homage. However that may be, kneeling has ever since in Roman Catholicism retained a primary connexion with penitence. In private prayer it is still, as it has been since the 2nd cent., usual but not obli gatory. In public adoration it is regular, though prostration may be used.

But as the posture for public prayer kneeling has never been regular except in Protestantism. The subject requires some detail. Origen in the 3rd cent. is one of the earliest writers to emphasize the penitential meaning; if forgiveness is required, he says, kneeling is essential. St. Ambrose, in the 4th cent., writes:

1 See F. T. Bergh, in CE, 8.v. 'Genuflexion.'
218 126.
8 Mk 1125, Lk 1811.13, Mt 65.

4 Lk 2241.

5 Bergh, loc. cit. The fact may indicate a difference of ritual between the Italian and the Levantine Christians.

[blocks in formation]

8 Eph 314, Ph 210.

9 F. S. Ranken (DCG, 8.v. Kneeling ') ascribes the Christian development of kneeling to Hellenistic influence.

10 Hermas, Past. i. 1; Tertullian, ad Scap. iv.

11 F. E. Warren, Liturgy of the Ante-Nicene Church, London, 1897, p. 145.

12 de Orat. 31 (PG xi. 552).

'The knee is made flexible, by which the offence of the Lord is mitigated, wrath appeased, grace called forth.'1

Pseudo-Alcuin has the general explanation:
By such posture of the body we show forth our humbleness

of heart.' 2

As early as Tertullian's time a distinction was marked; he observes that on Sundays and during Pentecost prayer was not to be said kneeling. The implication that a divergence of use existed is proved by the ruling of the Council of Nicæa, more than a century later:

'Because there are some who kneel on the Lord's Day and on the days of Pentecost, that all things may be uniformly performed in every parish or diocese, it seems good to the Holy Synod that the prayers be by all made to God, standing.' Standing was the attitude of praise and thanksgiving. Hence standing was obligatory during the psalms, hymns, and Eucharistic prayer. For a similar reason, perhaps, St. Benedict uttered his dying prayer standing, erectis in cœlum manibus.' In his lifetime he had instructed his monks to kneel during private prayer, not to stand as when in choir. There was, it is to be assumed, an inner meaning of penitence attaching to private prayer, and some importance here seems to have been given to the Gospel account of Christ's kneeling in solitary prayer. Naturally, public penance made use of the attitude of kneeling. The custom of the early Church is clearly marked by St. Basil, who describes kneeling as the lesser penance (μerávola μκpá) and prostration as the greater (μeTávola μeɣáλn). A posture with such associations was a favourite one for anchorites and ascetics. Some such associations of thought may have inspired Eusebius's observation that the knees of James, 'the Lord's brother,' became callous like a camel's, from continual kneeling. 7

6

The Canon Law emphasized still further the distinction between standing and kneeling. The latter was forbidden in public prayer at all the principal festivals. To be degraded into the class of genuflectentes or prostrati, who were obliged to kneel during public service even on Sundays and in paschal (or pentecostal) time, was a severe punishment. A gradation of posture appears in the two terms quoted, which still obtains in Roman Catho

lic adoration.

That kneeling is a posture characteristic of prayer, as such, is a principle developed by the Reformation Churches, adoration, on the one hand, and penance, on the other, being disregarded. The Declaration on Kneeling' during the Lord's Supper illustrates the avoidance of Roman Catholic adoration. The Presbyterians sat to receive the Communion. The originally threefold use of the attitude was perhaps assisted towards its Protestant simplification or reduction into one for prayer alone by the negative emphasis which it received from contrast with the Roman Catholic idea.

It is also remarkable that the practices of kneeling and genuflexion, or bending of the knee, are relatively modern in their application to ideas of reverence or adoration. Here, no doubt, religious and social ritual reacted upon one another. Genuflexion with one knee was developed in the Middle Ages, clearly showing a connexion with homage. The Carthusians are noteworthy for a traditional objection to kneeling in worship; they bend the knee without touching the ground. 10

In Roman Catholic ritual the rules governing kneeling are precise. The congregation kneel throughout a Low Mass, except during the reading of the Gospel. At High Mass they kneel or prostrate themselves at the words 'et incarnatus 1 Hexaem. vi. 9 [74].

2 de Divin. officiis, xviii. (PL ci. 1210). de Cor. Mil. 3; it is nefas.

Gregory, Dial. ii. 37.

5 Bergh, loc. cit. Eusebius says that kneeling was the regular attitude of Christians in private prayer (Vita Const. iv. 22).

6 Bergh, loc. cit.

8 Bergh, loc. cit.

7 HE ii. 23.

9 Ib.

10 lb.

1

est' and 'verbum caro factum est'-a modern development. When adoring the Blessed Sacrament unveiled, the faithful genuflect with both knees, but with the right knee only when revering it in the tabernacle. In the old bidding prayers, as in the diaconal litanies of the Greek Church, the officiating priest, asking the congregation to pray for some special 'intention,' said, Flectamus genua.' In penance and confirmation, and at the coronation of a king or queen, the blessing of a new knight, reconciliation, etc., kneeling is prescribed. The celebrant in the Roman, Greek, and Anglican Churches kneels in adoration, but communicates standing, The Lutheran Church and the Church of England have always prescribed reception of the sacrament kneeling. The Lutherans, however, stand at prayer. The Presbyterians stood at prayer, but in recent times they have adopted kneeling.

In European history the social uses of kneeling are confined to court ceremonial, when subjects salute the monarch, the ritual of homage in mediæval feudalism, and various courtly symbolic fashions, as between gentleman and lady. In feudal times the rule was kneeling on one knee in homage, on two in worship. Social friction has been produced in recent times by insistence on the kneeling attitude in connexion either with religious prejudice or with ideas of military discipline.2

The differences in the form of the posture of kneeling are simple. The only uncertainty is with the early Christian forms. Most probably there was in these an element of prostration, as was usual in Oriental forms then and is now, being characteristic also of Islam. The Muslim kneels by sitting on his feet, and in that position can make various grades of prostration of body and head. The words of Seneca, inflexo genu adorare," refer to an Oriental, not Græco-Roman, posture of

reverence.

It still

The classical adoratio was performed standing. The fashion of venerating the Roman Emperor in a posture of prostration, complete or from the knees, was of Persian origin, and its introduction is ascribed to Diocletian. obtains in Asiatic courts. Prostration in a more natural form was usual in Greek times for suppliants. Its incomplete form was kneeling. Here Augustine illustrates the natural evolution of the posture, and suggests at the same time the lines of its introduction into Christianity, by identifying kneeling with the suppliant attitude:

[ocr errors]

"They fix their knees, stretch forth their hands (a gesture of prayer), or even prostrate themselves on the ground.' LITERATURE.—This is fully given in the article.

A. E. CRAWLEY. KNOTS.-The symbolical use of the knot and the ceremony of tying and untying are practices of great antiquity and of world-wide distribution. Knots have, among practically all primitive races, a special mystical signification, namely, that as amulets they possess the power of hindering or impeding specific conditions. Generally speaking, the ultimate reason for this is not abstruse: the act of tying a knot implies something bound,' and hence the action becomes a spell towards hindering or impeding the actions of other persons or things. Similarly, the act of loosing a knot implies the removal of the impediment caused by the knot, and from this belief are derived the various customs of unloosing knots, unlocking and opening doors and cupboards, setting free 1 Bergh, loc. cit.

2 The kneeling controversy' in Bavaria (1838-45) arose from the King's Roman Catholic preferences (see E. Dorn, in PRE x. [1901) 590-594). The British Army has seen in the use of 'on the knee' an excess of discipline.

3T. P. Hughes, Dict. of Islam, London, 1895, s.v. 'Prayer,' has a series of elaborate drawings of the Muslim prayer-attitudes. 4 Herc. Fur. 410.

5 de Cura, 5.

« ZurückWeiter »