Hume's Abject Failure: The Argument Against Miracles

Cover
Oxford University Press, 23.11.2000 - 232 Seiten
This vital study offers a new interpretation of Hume's famous "Of Miracles," which notoriously argues against the possibility of miracles. By situating Hume's popular argument in the context of the eighteenth-century debate on miracles, Earman shows Hume's argument to be largely unoriginal and chiefly without merit where it is original. Yet Earman constructively conceives how progress can be made on the issues that Hume's essay so provocatively posed about the ability of eyewitness testimony to establish the credibility of marvelous and miraculous events.

Im Buch

Ausgewählte Seiten

Inhalt

Fall Back Positions for Hume
Probabilifying Religious Doctrines
Humes Contrary Miracles Argument
Conclusion
Appendix on Probability
Notes
Works Cited
Additional Bibliography

Humes Straight Rule of Induction and His Proof against Miracles
Hume Bayes and Price
Bayes and Bayesianism
The BayesPrice Rejection of Humes Straight Rule
Humes Stultification of Scientific Inquiry
The Indian Prince
Humes Maxim
What Is Humes Thesis?
Humes Diminution Principle
Multiple Witnessing 19 More Multiple Witnessing
What Is Right about Humes Position
John Locke An Essay Concerning Human Understanding Book
Chapter 6 Of Miracles
Samuel Clarke A Discourse Concerning the Unalterable
of Jesus
the Tryal of the Witnesses
Section 10 Of Miracles
Dissertation IV On the Importance of Christianity and
Anonymous George Hooper? A Calculation of the Credibility
Chapter 10 On Humes Argument against Miracles
Urheberrecht

Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen

Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen

Bibliografische Informationen