 ... whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection...  The Law of Contracts - Seite 204von John William Smith - 1878 - 580 SeitenVollansicht - Über dieses Buch
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1887 - 812 Seiten
...with the interest of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party can be of no benefit to either. It can only...oppressive, it is, in the eye of the law, unreasonable and void, on the ground of public policy, as being injurious to the interests of the public. The rule,... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, Peregrine Bingham - 1831 - 830 Seiten
...with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party, can be of no benefit to either, it can only...grounds of public policy. In the case above referred to, Lord Chief Justice Parker says, " A restraint to carry on a trade throughout the kingdom must be void... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Bayly Moore, Joseph Payne - 1832 - 874 Seiten
...restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party can be of no benefit to either; it 1831. can only be oppressive; and, if oppressive, it is...grounds of public policy. In the case above referred to, Lord Chief Justice Parker says — " a restraint to carry on a trade throughout the kingdom must be... | |
 | Samuel Bealey Harrison, Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Frederick Luard Wollaston - 1837 - 520 Seiten
...with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party, can be of no benefit to either, it can only...the law, unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interest of the public is void, on the grounds of public policy." It may indeed be said, that all such... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench - 1837 - 886 Seiten
...with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party, can be of no benefit to either: it can only...oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable." That refers to the case of 1837. 1837. a party, having no interest in a trade, taking a bond from another... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, John Leycester Adolphus, Thomas Flower Ellis - 1838 - 1096 Seiten
...with the interests or the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party, can be of no benefit to either, it can only...public is void, on the grounds of public policy." It may indeed be said that all such agreements interfere in some degree with the public interest ;... | |
 | Francis Stack Murphy, Edwin Tyrrell Hurlstone, Great Britain. Court of Exchequer - 1838 - 416 Seiten
...with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party can be of no benefit to either — it can only...interests of the public is void on the grounds of public policy.1' In former times the judges spoke of these agreements with great disapprobation. Hall, J.,... | |
 | 1839 - 474 Seiten
...the other."i And by Tindal, CJ : " Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party can be of no benefit to either ; it can only...oppressive, and if oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable."2 This principle is equally applicable to every other species of restraint, and is the... | |
 | John William Smith - 1841 - 744 Seiten
...with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party, can be of no benefit to either ; it can only...the law unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interest of the public is void, on the grounds of public policy. No certain precise boundary can be... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Chancery, Charles Beavan - 1842 - 730 Seiten
...interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party [requires] can be of no benefit to either ; it can only be oppressive,...the public is void on the grounds of public policy." Now, whatever may be the talents, knowledge, and experience of Mr. Howe, and I am disposed to rate... | |
| |
