 | 1885 - 544 Seiten
...argument rests upon an assumed principle of responsibility which does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability because the...against the negligence of any one but himself ; and be is not liable in tort, as for the negligence of his servant, because the person suffering does not... | |
 | Isaac Fletcher Redfield - 1870 - 708 Seiten
...argument rests upon an assumed principle of responsibility which does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability, because the...indemnify the servant against the negligence of any one hut himself; and he is not liable in tort, as for the negligence of his servant, because the person... | |
 | Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court - 1864 - 674 Seiten
...argument rests upon an assumed principle of responsibility which does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability, because the...means of providing for his safety, when he is employed m immediate connexion with those from whose negligence he might suffer ; but because the implied contract... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1882 - 962 Seiten
...and provided for in the rate of compensation as any others." 4 Mete. 57. " The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability because the...might suffer ; but because the implied contract of the muster does not extend to indemnify the servant against the negligence of any one but himself; and... | |
 | 1882 - 658 Seiten
...in a common employment. The master's liability depends upon the implied contract of the master not to indemnify the servant against the negligence of any one but himself. Hence the separatija of the employment into different departments does not take away the relation of... | |
 | Frederick Pollock - 1885 - 544 Seiten
...argument rests upon an assumed principle of responsibility which does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability because the...as for the negligence of his servant, because the pei-son suffering does not stand towards him in the relation of a stranger, but is one whose rights... | |
 | Lawrence Lewis, Adelbert Hamilton, John Houston Merrill, William Mark McKinney, James Manford Kerr, John Crawford Thomson - 1885 - 730 Seiten
...does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability because the sen-ant has better means of providing for his safety, when...negligence of any one but himself ; and he is not liable m tort, as for the negligence of his servant, because the person suffering does not stand towards him... | |
 | 1885 - 1232 Seiten
...argument rests upon an assumed principle of responsibility which does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability because the...to indemnify the servant against the negligence of anyone bul himself; and he is not liable in tort, as for the negligence of his servant, because the... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1885 - 844 Seiten
...argument rests upon an assumed principle of responsibility which does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability because the...suffer, but because the implied contract of the master docs not extend to indemnify the servant against the negligence of any one but himself; and he is not... | |
 | 1885 - 544 Seiten
...argument rests upon an assumed principle of responsibility which does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability because the...immediate connection with those from whose negligence be might suffer, but because the implied contract of the master does not extend to indemnify the servant... | |
| |
Besides, it appears to us, that the argument rests upon an assumed principle of responsibility which does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability because the servant has better means of providing for his safety when he... 
